University of Baltimore
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 234
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 230
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 174
- Astro and Planetary Science 128
- Instrumentation 136
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 133
- Top scholars
- Zoltán J. ÁcsAndrew Z. FireSi-Qun XuMary Katherine MontgomeryCraig C. MelloSusan P. BakerBrian O’NeillWilliam B. Long
- Journals
- The American Journal of Medicine (229 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (221 papers)Annals of Internal Medicine (211 papers)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (199 papers)The Journal of Urology (196 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
University of Baltimore
12.8k papers receiving 494.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Instrumentation 6.3k
- Biological Psychiatry 3.9k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 27.0k
- Molecular Biology 94.2k
- Emergency Medicine 10.9k
Countries citing scholars working at University of Baltimore
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Baltimore. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Baltimore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Baltimore more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Baltimore
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Baltimore at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Baltimore at the time of their publication.
About University of Baltimore
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Baltimore have published 15.0k papers, which have received a total of 555.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 643 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 136 papers in Instrumentation, 294 papers in Ophthalmology, 1.3k papers in Surgery and 114 papers in Otorhinolaryngology on the topics of Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (234 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (230 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (174 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (133 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (128 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (120 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (117 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (105 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Instrumentation (6.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (3.9k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (27.0k citations), Molecular Biology (94.2k citations) and Emergency Medicine (10.9k citations). Authors at University of Baltimore collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The American Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Annals of Internal Medicine, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and The Journal of Urology. Some of University of Baltimore's most productive authors include Zoltán J. Ács, Andrew Z. Fire, Si-Qun Xu, Mary Katherine Montgomery, Craig C. Mello, Susan P. Baker, Brian O’Neill, William B. Long, William F. Haddon and Attila Varga.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.