Botswana Predator Conservation Trust

8.2k citations
300 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Botswana Predator Conservation Trust

284 papers receiving 7.9k citations

Peers

Botswana Predator Conservation Trust
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Ecology 4.8k
  • Developmental Biology 397
  • Ecological Modeling 705
  • Small Animals 855
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
Replace Cheetah Conservation Fund with:
Cheetah Conservation Fund Namibia
Zimbabwe National Water Authority Zimbabwe
Kimberley Hospital South Africa
Forestry Commission Zimbabwe
African Conservation Centre Kenya
University of Toliara Madagascar
WWF Tanzania Tanzania
Save the Elephants Kenya
Kenya Forest Service Kenya
Madagascar Biodiversity Partnership Madagascar
Botswana Predator Conservation Trust relative to Cheetah Conservation Fund Namibia Cheetah Conservation Fund's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Cheetah Conservation Fund · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Botswana Predator Conservation Trust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Botswana Predator Conservation Trust. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Botswana Predator Conservation Trust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Botswana Predator Conservation Trust more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Botswana Predator Conservation Trust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Botswana Predator Conservation Trust at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Botswana Predator Conservation Trust at the time of their publication.

About Botswana Predator Conservation Trust

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Botswana Predator Conservation Trust have published 300 papers, which have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 190 papers in Ecology, 15 papers in Developmental Biology, 20 papers in Ecological Modeling, 30 papers in Small Animals and 33 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (164 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (43 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (36 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (31 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (28 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (27 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (4.8k citations), Developmental Biology (397 citations), Ecological Modeling (705 citations), Small Animals (855 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations). Authors at Botswana Predator Conservation Trust collaborate with scholars in Botswana, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, Ecology and Evolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Animal Behaviour and Journal of Zoology. Some of Botswana Predator Conservation Trust's most productive authors include John Weldon McNutt, Peter Apps, Neil R. Jordan, Alan M. Wilson, Gabriele Cozzi, Femke Broekhuis, Krystyna A. Golabek, Anna Songhurst, DELIA D. OWENS and David Whyte Macdonald.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact