Forestry Commission

4.9k citations
495 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Forestry Commission

410 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Forestry Commission
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
  • Forestry 250
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.3k
  • Ecology 1.2k
  • Insect Science 547
Replace Department of Research and Specialist Services with:
Department of Research and Specialist Services Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe National Water Authority Zimbabwe
Lúrio University Mozambique
Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development South Africa
Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources Botswana
Citrus Research International South Africa
Botswana Accountancy College Botswana
Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique Mozambique
Institute of Natural Resources South Africa
South African Sugarcane Research Institute South Africa
Forestry Commission relative to Department of Research and Specialist Services Zimbabwe Department of Research and Specialist Services's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Department of Research and Specialist Services · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Forestry Commission

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Forestry Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Forestry Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forestry Commission more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Forestry Commission

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Forestry Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Forestry Commission at the time of their publication.

About Forestry Commission

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Forestry Commission have published 495 papers, which have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 96 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 25 papers in Forestry, 93 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 70 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 92 papers in Ecology on the topics of Forest ecology and management (63 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (34 papers), Forest Management and Policy (33 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (27 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (27 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (26 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (22 papers) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations), Forestry (250 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k citations), Ecology (1.2k citations) and Insect Science (547 citations). Authors at Forestry Commission collaborate with scholars in Zimbabwe, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Australian Forestry, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research, Australian Veterinary Journal, Agroforestry Systems and Zootaxa. Some of Forestry Commission's most productive authors include R. K. Bamber, Tom Nisbet, Samantha Broadmeadow, K. W. Cremer, Elaine M. Birk, Joan Taylor, G. J. Mayhead, Hilde Oliver, David Jenkins and B Morris.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact