Cheetah Conservation Fund

6.3k citations
306 papers ·

Impact in

    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
    • Avian ecology and behavior
    • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Papers in

    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 163
    • Avian ecology and behavior 29
    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 38

Cheetah Conservation Fund

258 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Cheetah Conservation Fund
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Ecology 3.1k
  • Ecological Modeling 513
  • Small Animals 832
  • Genetics 1.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 583
Replace Botswana Predator Conservation Trust with:
Botswana Predator Conservation Trust Botswana
Zimbabwe National Water Authority Zimbabwe
Department of Agriculture, Western Cape Government South Africa
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Zambia
Forestry Commission Zimbabwe
Somerset Hospital South Africa
Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique Mozambique
South African Sugarcane Research Institute South Africa
Iringa Mercy Organization Tanzania
African Conservation Centre Kenya
Cheetah Conservation Fund relative to Botswana Predator Conservation Trust Botswana Botswana Predator Conservation Trust's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Botswana Predator Conservation Trust · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Cheetah Conservation Fund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Cheetah Conservation Fund. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Cheetah Conservation Fund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheetah Conservation Fund more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Cheetah Conservation Fund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Cheetah Conservation Fund at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Cheetah Conservation Fund at the time of their publication.

About Cheetah Conservation Fund

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Cheetah Conservation Fund have published 306 papers, which have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 194 papers in Ecology, 49 papers in Small Animals, 24 papers in Ecological Modeling, 7 papers in Developmental Biology and 38 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (163 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (38 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (30 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (29 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (28 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (24 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (22 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (3.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (513 citations), Small Animals (832 citations), Genetics (1.3k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (583 citations). Authors at Cheetah Conservation Fund collaborate with scholars in Namibia, United States and South Africa and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, African Journal of Wildlife Research, Ecology and Evolution, Journal of Wildlife Diseases and Oryx. Some of Cheetah Conservation Fund's most productive authors include Laurie L. Marker, Amy Dickman, David Whyte Macdonald, Julian Fennessy, Stefan Baral, Chris Beyrer, Gift Trapence, Eric Umar, M. G. L. Mills and Linda Munson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact