Conservation Leadership Programme
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 235
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 210
- Top scholars
- Andrew P. BalmfordWilliam R. SutherlandRhys E. GreenTatsuya AmanoNibedita MukherjeeNeil D. BurgessLynn Vanessa DicksDavid A. Coomes
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (75 papers)Conservation Biology (52 papers)Science (35 papers)Trends in Ecology & Evolution (35 papers)Conservation Letters (34 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Conservation Leadership Programme
1.0k papers receiving 68.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Ecological Modeling 11.6k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 15.9k
- Global and Planetary Change 25.7k
- Ecology 29.5k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 7.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Conservation Leadership Programme
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Conservation Leadership Programme. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Conservation Leadership Programme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation Leadership Programme more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Conservation Leadership Programme
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Conservation Leadership Programme at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Conservation Leadership Programme at the time of their publication.
About Conservation Leadership Programme
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Conservation Leadership Programme have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 71.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 235 papers in Ecological Modeling, 284 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 530 papers in Ecology, 428 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 106 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (247 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (235 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (223 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (210 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (128 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (114 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (101 papers) and Plant and animal studies (91 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (11.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (15.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (25.7k citations), Ecology (29.5k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (7.8k citations). Authors at Conservation Leadership Programme collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, Conservation Biology, Science, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Conservation Letters. Some of Conservation Leadership Programme's most productive authors include Andrew P. Balmford, William R. Sutherland, Rhys E. Green, Tatsuya Amano, Nibedita Mukherjee, Neil D. Burgess, Lynn Vanessa Dicks, David A. Coomes, Ben Phalan and Kerrie A. Wilson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.