Botho University

317 papers receiving 11.7k citations

Peers

Botho University
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Ecological Modeling 2.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.2k
  • Ecology 3.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.9k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
Replace Zimbabwe National Water Authority with:
Zimbabwe National Water Authority Zimbabwe
Endangered Wildlife Trust South Africa
Government of South Africa South Africa
IIE MSA South Africa
Department of Research and Specialist Services Zimbabwe
University of Lusaka Zambia
Lupane State University Zimbabwe
Lúrio University Mozambique
Education Labour Relations Council South Africa
National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council Zambia
Botho University relative to Zimbabwe National Water Authority Zimbabwe Zimbabwe National Water Authority's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Zimbabwe National Water Authority · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Botho University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Botho University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Botho University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Botho University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Botho University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Botho University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Botho University at the time of their publication.

About Botho University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Botho University have published 418 papers, which have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 7 papers in Health Informatics, 6 papers in Business and International Management, 11 papers in Health Information Management, 18 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 43 papers in Information Systems on the topics of IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (13 papers), Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation (13 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (13 papers), High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (11 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (10 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (10 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (10 papers) and Smart Agriculture and AI (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (2.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.2k citations), Ecology (3.3k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.9k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations). Authors at Botho University collaborate with scholars in Botswana, India and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Financial Review, Clinical Infectious Diseases, JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, The Lancet and Indian Journal of Science and Technology. Some of Botho University's most productive authors include Damaris Zurell, Björn Reineking, Andrew K. Skidmore, Sven Lautenbach, Patrick E. Osborne, Bernd Gruber, Carsten M. Buchmann, Sven Bacher, Carsten F. Dormann and Gudrun Carl.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact