Endangered Wildlife Trust
Impact in
- Ecology top 10%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Avian ecology and behavior
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Marine animal studies overview
Papers in
- Ecology 237
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 143
- Avian ecology and behavior 93
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation 33
-
- Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses 19
- Top scholars
- M. G. L. MillsHarriet T. Davies‐MostertDavid Whyte MacdonaldAndré J. BothaDu ToitPeter Andrew LindseyPaul J. FunstonWendy Collinson
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (20 papers)African Journal of Wildlife Research (13 papers)Journal of Zoology (11 papers)Oryx (10 papers)Animal Conservation (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Endangered Wildlife Trust
300 papers receiving 8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Ecology 5.4k
- Ecological Modeling 192
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 733
- Global and Planetary Change 496
- Small Animals 185
Countries citing scholars working at Endangered Wildlife Trust
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Endangered Wildlife Trust. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Endangered Wildlife Trust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Endangered Wildlife Trust more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Endangered Wildlife Trust
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Endangered Wildlife Trust at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Endangered Wildlife Trust at the time of their publication.
About Endangered Wildlife Trust
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Endangered Wildlife Trust have published 316 papers, which have received a total of 8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 237 papers in Ecology, 32 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 6 papers in Ecological Modeling, 21 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 10 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (143 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (93 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (33 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (19 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (13 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (8 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (5.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (192 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (733 citations), Global and Planetary Change (496 citations) and Small Animals (185 citations). Authors at Endangered Wildlife Trust collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, African Journal of Wildlife Research, Journal of Zoology, Oryx and Animal Conservation. Some of Endangered Wildlife Trust's most productive authors include M. G. L. Mills, Harriet T. Davies‐Mostert, David Whyte Macdonald, André J. Botha, Du Toit, Peter Andrew Lindsey, Paul J. Funston, Wendy Collinson, Laurie L. Marker and Harry Biggs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.