Education Labour Relations Council

357 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Education Labour Relations Council
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 139
  • Molecular Medicine 179
  • Pollution 426
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 64
  • Water Science and Technology 405
Replace Malawi University of Science and Technology with:
Malawi University of Science and Technology Malawi
Botho University Botswana
Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences Malawi
Lúrio University Mozambique
University of Lusaka Zambia
Research ICT Africa South Africa
Government of South Africa South Africa
Somerset Hospital South Africa
Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology Tanzania
Université Catholique de Bukavu Democratic Republic of the Congo
Education Labour Relations Council relative to Malawi University of Science and Technology Malawi Malawi University of Science and Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Malawi University of Science and Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Education Labour Relations Council

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Education Labour Relations Council. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Education Labour Relations Council with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Education Labour Relations Council more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Education Labour Relations Council

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Education Labour Relations Council at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Education Labour Relations Council at the time of their publication.

About Education Labour Relations Council

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Education Labour Relations Council have published 434 papers, which have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 11 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 10 papers in Molecular Medicine and 2 papers in Archeology on the topics of Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (19 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (19 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (15 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (14 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (11 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (10 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (9 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Energy Engineering and Power Technology (139 citations), Molecular Medicine (179 citations), Pollution (426 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (64 citations) and Water Science and Technology (405 citations). Authors at Education Labour Relations Council collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United States and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Engineering and Design, PLoS ONE, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE Access and Scientific Reports. Some of Education Labour Relations Council's most productive authors include Graham Jewitt, Gareth Simpson, Michiel C. J. de Wit, HH Meissner, Sanam Shahla Rizvi, Ian C. Duncan, P.A. Fourie, Rabia Riaz, Se Jin Kwon and Mark Howells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact