BMJ Group (United Kingdom)
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Healthcare Systems and Challenges
- Health Services Management and Policy
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Systems and Challenges 1.6k
- Health Services Management and Policy 1.4k
- Pharmacy 479
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues 460
- Top scholars
- Elisabeth MahaseGareth IacobucciRichard W. SmithFiona GodleeAbi RimmerClare DyerDavid MoherDouglas G. Altman
- Journals
- BMJ (5.5k papers)BMJ Open (27 papers)Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (24 papers)Medical Teacher (22 papers)The Lancet (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
BMJ Group (United Kingdom)
6.7k papers receiving 82k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
- General Health Professions 12.7k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 4.2k
- General Dentistry 169
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 10.5k
- Infectious Diseases 5.2k
Countries citing scholars working at BMJ Group (United Kingdom)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at BMJ Group (United Kingdom). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at BMJ Group (United Kingdom) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMJ Group (United Kingdom) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at BMJ Group (United Kingdom)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with BMJ Group (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with BMJ Group (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication.
About BMJ Group (United Kingdom)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with BMJ Group (United Kingdom) have published 7.9k papers, which have received a total of 82.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.1k papers in General Health Professions, 479 papers in Pharmacy, 586 papers in Health Information Management, 1.4k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 254 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Healthcare Systems and Challenges (1.6k papers), Health Services Management and Policy (1.4k papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (460 papers), Healthcare Regulation (400 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (327 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (275 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (231 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (228 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Health Professions (12.7k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (4.2k citations), General Dentistry (169 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (10.5k citations) and Infectious Diseases (5.2k citations). Authors at BMJ Group (United Kingdom) collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including BMJ, BMJ Open, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Medical Teacher and The Lancet. Some of BMJ Group (United Kingdom)'s most productive authors include Elisabeth Mahase, Gareth Iacobucci, Richard W. Smith, Fiona Godlee, Abi Rimmer, Clare Dyer, David Moher, Douglas G. Altman, Trish Groves and Kamran Ali Abbasi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.