Benson-Henry Institute
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
-
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 8
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 20
- Top scholars
- Gregory L. FricchioneDarshan H. MehtaElyse R. ParkHerbert BensonJohn W. DenningerHenry J. MankinJeffery A. DusekAna‐Maria Vranceanu
- Journals
- The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (11 papers)Global Advances in Health and Medicine (11 papers)Stroke (7 papers)Psychosomatics (6 papers)Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Benson-Henry Institute
165 papers receiving 6.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Behavioral Neuroscience 540
- Clinical Psychology 2.2k
- Biological Psychiatry 241
- Applied Psychology 317
- Psychiatry and Mental health 886
Countries citing scholars working at Benson-Henry Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Benson-Henry Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Benson-Henry Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benson-Henry Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Benson-Henry Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Benson-Henry Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Benson-Henry Institute at the time of their publication.
About Benson-Henry Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Benson-Henry Institute have published 235 papers, which have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 13 papers in Applied Psychology, 21 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 9 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 53 papers in Clinical Psychology and 26 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (25 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (20 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (11 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (8 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Behavioral Neuroscience (540 citations), Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (241 citations), Applied Psychology (317 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (886 citations). Authors at Benson-Henry Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Global Advances in Health and Medicine, Stroke, Psychosomatics and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. Some of Benson-Henry Institute's most productive authors include Gregory L. Fricchione, Darshan H. Mehta, Elyse R. Park, Herbert Benson, John W. Denninger, Henry J. Mankin, Jeffery A. Dusek, Ana‐Maria Vranceanu, Michelle L. Dossett and Mark C. Gebhardt.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.