Federal Institute for Risk Assessment

117.1k citations
3.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment

3.2k papers receiving 109.0k citations

Peers

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Endocrinology 10.8k
  • Molecular Medicine 9.1k
  • Food Science 21.4k
  • Small Animals 7.6k
  • Pollution 12.2k
Replace Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology with:
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology Czechia
Robert Koch Institute Germany
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research Germany
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene Germany
Statens Serum Institut Denmark
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation Germany
Novo Nordisk Foundation Denmark
Institut für Hygiene und Umwelt Germany
Veterinary Research Institute Czechia
University of Veterinary Sciences Brno Czechia
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment relative to Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology Czechia Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Federal Institute for Risk Assessment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Institute for Risk Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Institute for Risk Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Institute for Risk Assessment more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Institute for Risk Assessment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Institute for Risk Assessment at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Institute for Risk Assessment at the time of their publication.

About Federal Institute for Risk Assessment

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Institute for Risk Assessment have published 3.6k papers, which have received a total of 117.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 292 papers in Endocrinology, 292 papers in Small Animals, 727 papers in Food Science, 195 papers in Molecular Medicine and 505 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis on the topics of Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (388 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (297 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (241 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (212 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (193 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (164 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (164 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (135 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Endocrinology (10.8k citations), Molecular Medicine (9.1k citations), Food Science (21.4k citations), Small Animals (7.6k citations) and Pollution (12.2k citations). Authors at Federal Institute for Risk Assessment collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Archives of Toxicology, Toxicology Letters, PLoS ONE, Food Control and Frontiers in Microbiology. Some of Federal Institute for Risk Assessment's most productive authors include Andreas Luch, Reimar Johne, Beatriz da Silva Guerra, Alfonso Lampen, Lothar Beutin, Karsten Nöckler, Burkhard Malorny, Albert Braeuning, Jens A. Hammerl and Reiner Helmuth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact