British American Tobacco (United Kingdom)
Impact in
-
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
-
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Papers in
-
- Air Quality and Health Impacts 76
- Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure 50
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact 26
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 82
- Top scholars
- Richard R. BakerKevin McAdamChristopher ProctorDavid ThorneClive MeredithMarianna GaçaIan M. FearonChristopher Wright
- Journals
- Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (46 papers)Toxicology in Vitro (19 papers)Toxicology Letters (19 papers)Scientific Reports (17 papers)Food and Chemical Toxicology (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
British American Tobacco (United Kingdom)
448 papers receiving 12.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 4.0k
- Physiology 4.3k
- Cancer Research 2.2k
- Chemical Health and Safety 56
- Biochemistry 439
Countries citing scholars working at British American Tobacco (United Kingdom)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at British American Tobacco (United Kingdom). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at British American Tobacco (United Kingdom)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication.
About British American Tobacco (United Kingdom)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) have published 504 papers, which have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 139 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 85 papers in Cancer Research, 147 papers in Physiology, 20 papers in Biochemistry and 34 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Smoking Behavior and Cessation (131 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (82 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (76 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (50 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (40 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (32 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (26 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (4.0k citations), Physiology (4.3k citations), Cancer Research (2.2k citations), Chemical Health and Safety (56 citations) and Biochemistry (439 citations). Authors at British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Toxicology in Vitro, Toxicology Letters, Scientific Reports and Food and Chemical Toxicology. Some of British American Tobacco (United Kingdom)'s most productive authors include Richard R. Baker, Kevin McAdam, Christopher Proctor, David Thorne, Clive Meredith, Marianna Gaça, Ian M. Fearon, Christopher Wright, Rose M. Baker and Graham Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.