University of Augsburg

422.5k citations
17.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Augsburg

16.1k papers receiving 420.9k citations

Peers

University of Augsburg
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Condensed Matter Physics 37.6k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 34k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 29.8k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 48.6k
  • Materials Chemistry 48.5k
Replace University of Stuttgart with:
University of Stuttgart Germany
Technische Universität Darmstadt Germany
University of Bayreuth Germany
University of Trento Italy
Technische Universität Berlin Germany
Leibniz University Hannover Germany
Technische Universität Braunschweig Germany
University of Bremen Germany
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Germany
Université Grenoble Alpes France
University of Augsburg relative to University of Stuttgart Germany University of Stuttgart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Stuttgart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Augsburg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Augsburg. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Augsburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Augsburg more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Augsburg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Augsburg at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Augsburg at the time of their publication.

About University of Augsburg

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Augsburg have published 17.6k papers, which have received a total of 422.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 686 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 830 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 489 papers in Mathematical Physics and 1.2k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics on the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (638 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (537 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (359 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (335 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (297 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (287 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (283 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (258 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (37.6k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (34k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (29.8k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (48.6k citations) and Materials Chemistry (48.5k citations). Authors at University of Augsburg collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review B, Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of the Association for Information Systems. Some of University of Augsburg's most productive authors include Peter Hänggi A, Alois Loidl, Franz J. Gießibl, Peter Talkner A, J. Mannhart, Peter Reimann, Elisabeth André, P. Lunkenheimer, Björn Wolfgang Schuller and Gerhard Reinelt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact