Danish Academy of Technical Sciences

22.6k citations
554 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Danish Academy of Technical Sciences

508 papers receiving 22.1k citations

Peers

Danish Academy of Technical Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Insect Science 1.8k
  • Analytical Chemistry 1.2k
  • Biotechnology 1.0k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.0k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.7k
Replace Danish Gas Technology Centre (Denmark) with:
Danish Gas Technology Centre (Denmark) Denmark
Ideon Science Park Sweden
University College West Flanders Belgium
Agilent Technologies (Germany) Germany
Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine France
Dienstleistungszentrum Ländlicher Raum Germany
VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology Belgium
Steinbeis Foundation Germany
Bundeswehr Medical Service Academy Germany
Lund Science (Sweden) Sweden
Danish Academy of Technical Sciences relative to Danish Gas Technology Centre (Denmark) Denmark Danish Gas Technology Centre (Denmark)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.1×
Danish Gas Technology Centre (Denmark) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Danish Academy of Technical Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Danish Academy of Technical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Danish Academy of Technical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danish Academy of Technical Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Danish Academy of Technical Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Danish Academy of Technical Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Danish Academy of Technical Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Danish Academy of Technical Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Danish Academy of Technical Sciences have published 554 papers, which have received a total of 22.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 54 papers in Insect Science, 20 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 81 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 84 papers in Plant Science and 17 papers in Biotechnology on the topics of Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (21 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (20 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (17 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (15 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (15 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (1.8k citations), Analytical Chemistry (1.2k citations), Biotechnology (1.0k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (1.0k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.7k citations). Authors at Danish Academy of Technical Sciences collaborate with scholars in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including FEBS Letters, Journal of Economic Entomology, Applied Physics B, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Planta. Some of Danish Academy of Technical Sciences's most productive authors include Agnar Höskuldsson, Jørgen Arendt Jensen, Peter M. H. Heegaard, Ulrik Boas, B. Bay, N. Hansen, D. Kuhlmann‐Wilsdorf, Michael Kristensen, Peter Karim Ben Embarek and Karsten Schnack.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact