Program Support Center
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Nephrology top 10%
- Acute Kidney Injury Research
Papers in
-
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 21
- Statistical Methods and Inference 10
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 8
- Top scholars
- Peter N. PeduzziAlvan R. FeinsteinJohn ConcatoTheodore R. HolfordElizabeth KemperJoseph F. CollinsDavid G. WeissCarlos E. Palant
- Journals
- Controlled Clinical Trials (15 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (13 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (9 papers)The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (9 papers)JAMA Network Open (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Program Support Center
259 papers receiving 18.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
- Rehabilitation 1.0k
- Nephrology 1.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.7k
- Epidemiology 2.9k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Program Support Center
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Program Support Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Program Support Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Program Support Center more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Program Support Center
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Program Support Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Program Support Center at the time of their publication.
About Program Support Center
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Program Support Center have published 303 papers, which have received a total of 23.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 31 papers in Statistics and Probability, 14 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 2 papers in Leadership and Management, 1 paper in Microbiology and 30 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (21 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (13 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (12 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (10 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (9 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Rehabilitation (1.0k citations), Nephrology (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.7k citations), Epidemiology (2.9k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.6k citations). Authors at Program Support Center collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Controlled Clinical Trials, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, New England Journal of Medicine, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and JAMA Network Open. Some of Program Support Center's most productive authors include Peter N. Peduzzi, Alvan R. Feinstein, John Concato, Theodore R. Holford, Elizabeth Kemper, Joseph F. Collins, David G. Weiss, Carlos E. Palant, Paul L. Kimmel and RICHARD L. AMDUR.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.