University of Applied Sciences Worms

391 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

University of Applied Sciences Worms
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 572
  • Business and International Management 149
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 397
  • Gastroenterology 168
  • Transportation 226
Replace Statistisches Bundesamt with:
Statistisches Bundesamt Germany
University of Aosta Valley Italy
Fryske Akademy Netherlands
Steinbeis University Berlin Germany
Capgemini (Netherlands) Netherlands
5T Torino (Italy) Italy
Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences Germany
University of Applied Sciences Stralsund Germany
Centre d’Economie Industrielle - CERNA France
Centre Hospitalier de Troyes France
University of Applied Sciences Worms relative to Statistisches Bundesamt Germany Statistisches Bundesamt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Statistisches Bundesamt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Applied Sciences Worms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Applied Sciences Worms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Applied Sciences Worms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Applied Sciences Worms more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Applied Sciences Worms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Applied Sciences Worms at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Applied Sciences Worms at the time of their publication.

About University of Applied Sciences Worms

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Applied Sciences Worms have published 534 papers, which have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 50 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 8 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 40 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 64 papers in Strategy and Management and 38 papers in Signal Processing on the topics of Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (41 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (40 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (38 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (37 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (36 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (23 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (23 papers) and Network Security and Intrusion Detection (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (572 citations), Business and International Management (149 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (397 citations), Gastroenterology (168 citations) and Transportation (226 citations). Authors at University of Applied Sciences Worms collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and Poland and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Air Transport Management, Paläontologische Zeitschrift, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Annals of Oncology and IEEE Security & Privacy. Some of University of Applied Sciences Worms's most productive authors include Heiko Haase, Steffen Wendzel, Mário Franco, Frank Fichert, Rudolf Maleri, Roland Conrady, Wojciech Mazurczyk, Richard Klophaus, Arndt Lautenschläger and Jan Drengner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact