Association of Military Surgeons of the United States
Impact in
-
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Papers in
-
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation 21
-
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 37
- Top scholars
- Thomas M. ScaleaStephen M. CohnMark McKenneyRichard SosisCandace S. AlcortaJohn BonadiesMauricio LynnJana MacLeod
- Journals
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (68 papers)The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (41 papers)Annals of Plastic Surgery (25 papers)Obstetrics and Gynecology (16 papers)The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomEgypt
In The Last Decade
Association of Military Surgeons of the United States
474 papers receiving 17.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 2.8k
- Emergency Medicine 3.7k
- Surgery 6.9k
- Internal Medicine 260
- Rehabilitation 485
Countries citing scholars working at Association of Military Surgeons of the United States
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Association of Military Surgeons of the United States. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Association of Military Surgeons of the United States with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Association of Military Surgeons of the United States more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Association of Military Surgeons of the United States
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Association of Military Surgeons of the United States at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Association of Military Surgeons of the United States at the time of their publication.
About Association of Military Surgeons of the United States
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Association of Military Surgeons of the United States have published 601 papers, which have received a total of 21.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 28 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 46 papers in Emergency Medicine, 140 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Rehabilitation and 7 papers in Occupational Therapy on the topics of Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (37 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (35 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (24 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (21 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (13 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (12 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (10 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (2.8k citations), Emergency Medicine (3.7k citations), Surgery (6.9k citations), Internal Medicine (260 citations) and Rehabilitation (485 citations). Authors at Association of Military Surgeons of the United States collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Egypt and have published in prestigious journals including Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Some of Association of Military Surgeons of the United States's most productive authors include Thomas M. Scalea, Stephen M. Cohn, Mark McKenney, Richard Sosis, Candace S. Alcorta, John Bonadies, Mauricio Lynn, Jana MacLeod, Mary Murtha and Richard P. Dutton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.