Animal Health Trust

76.3k citations
2.7k papers ·

Impact in

  • Equine top 0.05%
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Small Animals top 0.5%
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Papers in

  • Equine 678
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research 678
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 131
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology 129

Animal Health Trust

2.4k papers receiving 69.2k citations

Peers

Animal Health Trust
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Equine 19.2k
  • Small Animals 13.6k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 6.3k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 6.6k
  • Microbiology 3.6k
Replace École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort with:
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort France
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse France
Département Santé Animale France
Oniris France
Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d'Auvergne France
Bristol Royal Infirmary United Kingdom
Moredun Research Institute United Kingdom
Royal College of Surgeons of England United Kingdom
Wellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research United Kingdom
Center for Pediatric Endocrinology Zurich Switzerland
Animal Health Trust relative to École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort France École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Animal Health Trust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Animal Health Trust. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Animal Health Trust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal Health Trust more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Animal Health Trust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Animal Health Trust at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Animal Health Trust at the time of their publication.

About Animal Health Trust

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Animal Health Trust have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 76.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 678 papers in Equine, 499 papers in Small Animals, 204 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 141 papers in Microbiology and 214 papers in Animal Science and Zoology on the topics of Veterinary Equine Medical Research (678 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (185 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (131 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (129 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (126 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (102 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (99 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (98 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Equine (19.2k citations), Small Animals (13.6k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (6.3k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (6.6k citations) and Microbiology (3.6k citations). Authors at Animal Health Trust collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Equine Veterinary Journal, Journal of Small Animal Practice, Veterinary Record, The Veterinary Journal and Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. Some of Animal Health Trust's most productive authors include Sue Dyson, H. Williams Smith, James L. N. Wood, L. B. JEFFCOTT, Rachel C. Murray, Simon R. Platt, J. R. Newton, J. A. Mumford, Polly Taylor and K. C. Barnett.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact