École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse

177.1k citations
6.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse

5.5k papers receiving 163.5k citations

Peers

École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Small Animals 19.1k
  • Equine 2.9k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 18.4k
  • Parasitology 10.8k
  • Endocrinology 7.9k
Replace Département Génétique Animale with:
Département Génétique Animale France
Département Santé Animale France
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort France
VetAgro Sup France
Oniris France
Bipar France
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail France
Royal Agricultural University United Kingdom
Royal Veterinary College United Kingdom
The Pirbright Institute United Kingdom
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse relative to Département Génétique Animale France Département Génétique Animale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Département Génétique Animale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse at the time of their publication.

About École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse

In recent decades, authors affiliated with École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse have published 6.2k papers, which have received a total of 177.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 749 papers in Small Animals, 126 papers in Equine, 738 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 626 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 326 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (337 papers), Helminth infection and control (270 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (261 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (243 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (211 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (200 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (188 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (183 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Small Animals (19.1k citations), Equine (2.9k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (18.4k citations), Parasitology (10.8k citations) and Endocrinology (7.9k citations). Authors at École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Veterinary Parasitology, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, animal and Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Some of École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse's most productive authors include Pierre‐Louis Toutain, Y. Ruckebusch, Éric Oswald, Alain Bousquet‐mélou, Denis E. Corpet, Isabelle Paule Oswald, Hervé Hoste, Jean P. Euzéby, Jean‐Philippe Nougayrède and Fabrice H.F. Pierre.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact