Arab Foundations Forum
Impact in
-
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
-
- Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Papers in
-
- Health, Nursing, Elderly Care 33
- Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare 8
- Top scholars
- Ulrich GueldenerTony Fan-Cheong ChanJean–François AujolGuy GilboaStanley OsherHélio Amante MiotLuciane Donida Bartoli MiotAna Carolina Handel
- Journals
- Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem (22 papers)Open Systems & Information Dynamics (12 papers)Wireless Personal Communications (6 papers)Journal of Scientific Computing (5 papers)Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- JordanBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Arab Foundations Forum
328 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
- Dermatology 374
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 781
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 32
- General Health Professions 552
- Cell Biology 350
Countries citing scholars working at Arab Foundations Forum
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Arab Foundations Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Arab Foundations Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arab Foundations Forum more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Arab Foundations Forum
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Arab Foundations Forum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Arab Foundations Forum at the time of their publication.
About Arab Foundations Forum
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Arab Foundations Forum have published 404 papers, which have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 53 papers in General Health Professions, 1 paper in Computational Mathematics, 11 papers in Health, 9 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 35 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (33 papers), Palliative and Oncologic Care (11 papers), Youth, Drugs, and Violence (10 papers), Public Health in Brazil (10 papers), Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (10 papers), Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic (9 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (8 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Dermatology (374 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (781 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (32 citations), General Health Professions (552 citations) and Cell Biology (350 citations). Authors at Arab Foundations Forum collaborate with scholars in Jordan, Brazil and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, Open Systems & Information Dynamics, Wireless Personal Communications, Journal of Scientific Computing and Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision. Some of Arab Foundations Forum's most productive authors include Ulrich Gueldener, Tony Fan-Cheong Chan, Jean–François Aujol, Guy Gilboa, Stanley Osher, Hélio Amante Miot, Luciane Donida Bartoli Miot, Ana Carolina Handel, Rama Chellappa and Vasu Parameswaran.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.