Adler University
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 10%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Counseling Practices and Supervision
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Papers in
-
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 14
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 10
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 17
- Counseling Practices and Supervision 15
- Top scholars
- Wendy B. BostwickSean Esteban McCabeTonda L. HughesCarol J. BoydGeoff J. BathjeBrady Thomas WestDouglas M. WhitesideJacobus Donders
- Journals
- American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis (7 papers)Journal of Feminist Family Therapy (7 papers)The Clinical Neuropsychologist (6 papers)Journal of Humanistic Psychology (5 papers)Contemporary Family Therapy (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Adler University
287 papers receiving 6.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Social Psychology 2k
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Applied Psychology 252
- Health 199
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 55
Countries citing scholars working at Adler University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Adler University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Adler University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adler University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Adler University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Adler University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Adler University at the time of their publication.
About Adler University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Adler University have published 321 papers, which have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 83 papers in Clinical Psychology, 65 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in General Psychology, 10 papers in Applied Psychology and 4 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology on the topics of LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (17 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (15 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (14 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (11 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (11 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (11 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Social Psychology (2k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Applied Psychology (252 citations), Health (199 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (55 citations). Authors at Adler University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Journal of Humanistic Psychology and Contemporary Family Therapy. Some of Adler University's most productive authors include Wendy B. Bostwick, Sean Esteban McCabe, Tonda L. Hughes, Carol J. Boyd, Geoff J. Bathje, Brady Thomas West, Douglas M. Whiteside, Jacobus Donders, Jack C. Lennon and Anita Jones Thomas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.