Contemporary Family Therapy

1.2k papers and 12.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Contemporary Family Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Family Therapy usually cover Clinical Psychology (862 papers), Social Psychology (656 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (272 papers) specifically the topics of Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (424 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (417 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (227 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Family Therapy are Scott Johnson, Muhammad M. Haj‐Yahia, Alan Carr, Elizabeth A. Skowron, Allan Wade, Ora Peleg, Jim Lantz, Nancy L. Murdock, Jerry Gale and Frank M. Dattilio.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Family Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Family Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Family Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Family Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Family Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Family Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Family Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025