ACT Government

253.7k citations
5.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

ACT Government

4.8k papers receiving 232.5k citations

Peers

ACT Government
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Global and Planetary Change 39.4k
  • Ecological Modeling 7.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 20.2k
  • Ecology 38.6k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 23.6k
Replace University of Canberra with:
University of Canberra Australia
Australian Research Council Australia
Environmental Earth Sciences Australia
CSIRO Land and Water Australia
University of the Sunshine Coast Australia
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Australia
Health Sciences and Nutrition Australia
Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine Australia
Royal Children's Hospital Australia
James Cook University Australia
ACT Government relative to University of Canberra Australia University of Canberra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
University of Canberra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at ACT Government

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at ACT Government. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at ACT Government with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACT Government more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at ACT Government

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with ACT Government at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with ACT Government at the time of their publication.

About ACT Government

In recent decades, authors affiliated with ACT Government have published 5.6k papers, which have received a total of 253.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 169 papers in Ecological Modeling, 380 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 532 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 611 papers in Ecology and 129 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (188 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (176 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (169 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (118 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (115 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (102 papers), Climate variability and models (102 papers) and Plant and animal studies (101 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (39.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (7.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (20.2k citations), Ecology (38.6k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (23.6k citations). Authors at ACT Government collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Australian Veterinary Journal, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, BMJ Open and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. Some of ACT Government's most productive authors include Julian R. W. Reid, Lars Sommer Jermiin, Thomas King-Fung Wong, Subha Kalyaanamoorthy, Bùi Quang Minh, Arndt von Haeseler, Stephen R. Carpenter, Marten Scheffer, Brian Robert Walker and Jonathan A. Foley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact