Australian Catholic University

383.8k citations
14.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Australian Catholic University

11.4k papers receiving 302.7k citations

Peers

Australian Catholic University
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 34.8k
  • Applied Psychology 12.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 40.6k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 26.0k
  • Social Psychology 40.1k
Replace Western Sydney University with:
Western Sydney University Australia
University of Canberra Australia
Charles Sturt University Australia
Deakin University Australia
Victoria University Australia
Swinburne University of Technology Australia
Southern Cross University Australia
University of Southern Queensland Australia
Federation University Australia
Bond University Australia
Australian Catholic University relative to Western Sydney University Australia Western Sydney University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Western Sydney University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Australian Catholic University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Australian Catholic University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Australian Catholic University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Catholic University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Australian Catholic University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Australian Catholic University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Australian Catholic University at the time of their publication.

About Australian Catholic University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Australian Catholic University have published 14.2k papers, which have received a total of 383.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 72 papers in Research and Theory, 2.5k papers in Education, 953 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 327 papers in Applied Psychology on the topics of Sports Performance and Training (524 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (495 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (334 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (322 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (300 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (256 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (252 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (245 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (34.8k citations), Applied Psychology (12.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (40.6k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (26.0k citations) and Social Psychology (40.1k citations). Authors at Australian Catholic University collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of science and medicine in sport, PLoS ONE, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Osteoporosis International and Sports Medicine. Some of Australian Catholic University's most productive authors include Richard M. Ryan, Tim J. Gabbett, Edward L. Deci, Louise M. Burke, Herbert W. Marsh, Alexandre J. S. Morin, John A. Hawley, Reinhard H. Pekrun, Philip David Parker and Geraldine A. Naughton.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact