Services Australia

85.3k citations
3.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Child Abuse and Trauma 60
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 39
    • Migration, Health and Trauma 38
    • Family and Disability Support Research 38
    • Homelessness and Social Issues 49

Services Australia

2.7k papers receiving 71.0k citations

Peers

Services Australia
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Clinical Psychology 6.1k
  • General Health Professions 5.4k
  • Health 1.7k
  • Emergency Medicine 1.8k
  • Epidemiology 6.7k
Replace ACT Government with:
ACT Government Australia
New South Wales Department of Health Australia
University of Canberra Australia
National Health and Medical Research Council Australia
Sydney Local Health District Australia
Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals Australia
Nepean Hospital Australia
Federation University Australia
Monash Health Australia
Eastern Health Australia
Services Australia relative to ACT Government Australia ACT Government's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
ACT Government · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Services Australia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Services Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Services Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Services Australia more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Services Australia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Services Australia at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Services Australia at the time of their publication.

About Services Australia

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Services Australia have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 85.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 297 papers in Clinical Psychology, 249 papers in General Health Professions, 38 papers in Public Administration, 75 papers in Health and 85 papers in Safety Research on the topics of Child Abuse and Trauma (60 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (54 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (49 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (39 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (39 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (38 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (38 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (6.1k citations), General Health Professions (5.4k citations), Health (1.7k citations), Emergency Medicine (1.8k citations) and Epidemiology (6.7k citations). Authors at Services Australia collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Australian Veterinary Journal, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, The Medical Journal of Australia and Animal Production Science. Some of Services Australia's most productive authors include Vijaya Sundararajan, William A. Ghali, Hude Quan, Patricia Halfon, Bernard Burnand, Jean‐Christophe Luthi, Thomas E. Feasby, Andrew Fong, L. Duncan Saunders and Cynthia A Beck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact