NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation

8.3k citations
372 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation

264 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 335
  • Emergency Medicine 513
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 144
  • General Health Professions 1.0k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 301
Replace Nambour General Hospital with:
Nambour General Hospital Australia
Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital Australia
Nursing Research Institute Australia
Department of Social Services Australia
NSW Ambulance Australia
King George V Memorial Hospital Australia
Goulburn Valley Health Australia
Royal Australasian College of Physicians Australia
Australian Orthopaedic Association Australia
Victorian Aboriginal Health Service Australia
NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation relative to Nambour General Hospital Australia Nambour General Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Nambour General Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation at the time of their publication.

About NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation have published 372 papers, which have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Emergency Medicine, 52 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 10 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 57 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Emergency and Acute Care Studies (22 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (19 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (18 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (16 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (13 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (335 citations), Emergency Medicine (513 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (144 citations), General Health Professions (1.0k citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (301 citations). Authors at NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Emergency Medicine Australasia, The Medical Journal of Australia, BMJ Open, Injury and Burns. Some of NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation's most productive authors include Jean‐Frédéric Lévesque, James Walter Middleton, Sally M McCarthy, Kim Sutherland, Rick A. M. Iedema, Doug Elliott, Robyn Speerin, Rosalind M. Elliott, M. Verhamme Fien and Sharon McKinley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact