Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo.
Impact in
- Oncology 198
Classified as
- Authors
- Isaiah J. Fidler
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w97029010 →Countries where authors are citing Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo.
This map shows the geographic impact of Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo.
This network shows the impact of Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo..
About Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo.
This paper, published in 1975, received 520 indexed citations . Written by Isaiah J. Fidler covering the research area of Immunology, Biotechnology and Toxicology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (209 citations), Oncology (198 citations), Immunology (169 citations), Cancer Research (98 citations) and Cell Biology (67 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w97029010.