Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control

652 indexed citations
published 1999

Countries where authors are citing Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control.

About Curbing the Epidemic Goverment s and the Economics of Tobacco Control

This paper, published in 1999, received 652 indexed citations . Written by Prabhat Jha and Frank J. Chaloupka. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (371 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (157 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (113 citations), General Health Professions (91 citations) and Speech and Hearing (58 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w92064313.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact