Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86338904 →Countries where authors are citing Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008.
This map shows the geographic impact of Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008.
This network shows the impact of Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008..
About Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980-2008.
This paper, published in 2011, received 331 indexed citations . Written by Margaret Warner, Lihui Chen, Diane M. Makuc, Robert N. Anderson and Arialdi Miniño covering the research area of Pharmacology, Emergency Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (194 citations), Emergency Medicine (63 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (39 citations), Epidemiology (37 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (25 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86338904.