Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America

333 indexed citations
published 2013

Impact in

Classified as

Countries where authors are citing Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America.

About Elder Mistreatment: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation in an Aging America

This paper, published in 2013, received 333 indexed citations . Written by Richard J. Bonnie and Robert B. Wallace covering the research area of Demography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Demography (300 citations), Clinical Psychology (141 citations), Health (131 citations), Sociology and Political Science (53 citations) and General Health Professions (50 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w85632801.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact