Best Practices in School Psychology IV
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85574299 →Countries where authors are citing Best Practices in School Psychology IV
This map shows the geographic impact of Best Practices in School Psychology IV. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Best Practices in School Psychology IV with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Best Practices in School Psychology IV more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Best Practices in School Psychology IV
This network shows the impact of Best Practices in School Psychology IV. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Best Practices in School Psychology IV.
About Best Practices in School Psychology IV
This paper, published in 1995, received 923 indexed citations . Written by Alex Thomas, Jeff Grimes and Brian C. McKevitt covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (571 citations), Clinical Psychology (390 citations), Education (379 citations), Social Psychology (182 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (104 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85574299.