Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma.
Impact in
- Pharmacology 375
- Genetics 187
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84874433 →Countries where authors are citing Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma.
This map shows the geographic impact of Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma.
This network shows the impact of Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma..
About Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma.
This paper, published in 1999, received 584 indexed citations . Written by Katja Zimmermann, Mario Sarbia, Artur‐Aron Weber, F Borchard, Helmut E. Gabbert and Karsten Schrör covering the research area of Genetics, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (375 citations), Genetics (187 citations), Surgery (124 citations), Molecular Biology (98 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84874433.