Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes
Impact in
- Surgery 89
- Authors
- Peter FayersDavid Machin
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84744488 →Countries where authors are citing Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes
This map shows the geographic impact of Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes
This network shows the impact of Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes.
About Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Peter Fayers and David Machin. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (101 citations), Surgery (89 citations), Oncology (81 citations), Economics and Econometrics (81 citations) and Clinical Psychology (67 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84744488.