Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- E. Allan Lind
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w84739788 →Countries where authors are citing Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.
This map shows the geographic impact of Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.
This network shows the impact of Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations..
About Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.
This paper, published in 2001, received 663 indexed citations . Written by E. Allan Lind covering the research area of Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (409 citations), Sociology and Political Science (300 citations), Social Psychology (152 citations), Information Systems and Management (91 citations) and Gender Studies (81 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w84739788.