Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
Impact in
- Authors
- James H. Steiger
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83309902 →Countries where authors are citing Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
This map shows the geographic impact of Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Statistically based tests for the number of common factors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Statistically based tests for the number of common factors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
This network shows the impact of Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Statistically based tests for the number of common factors.
About Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
This paper, published in 1980, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by James H. Steiger. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (496 citations), Social Psychology (470 citations), Sociology and Political Science (366 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (306 citations) and Education (269 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83309902.