The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w830982 →Countries where authors are citing The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action
This map shows the geographic impact of The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action
This network shows the impact of The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action.
About The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action
This paper, published in 2014, received 444 indexed citations . covering the research area of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (164 citations), Molecular Medicine (89 citations), Molecular Biology (61 citations), Food Science (50 citations) and Epidemiology (49 citations). Published in DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w830982.