Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens
Impact in
- Plant Science 240
- Food Science 212
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w81307136 →Countries where authors are citing Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens
This map shows the geographic impact of Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens
This network shows the impact of Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens.
About Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant Against Plant and Human Pathogens
This paper, published in 2008, received 409 indexed citations . Written by B. Mahesh and S. Satish covering the research area of Plant Science, Food Science and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (240 citations), Food Science (212 citations), Molecular Biology (87 citations), Pharmacology (70 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (63 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w81307136.