Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Nancy MacLean
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w76972818 →Countries where authors are citing Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America
This map shows the geographic impact of Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America
This network shows the impact of Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America.
About Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America
This paper, published in 2017, received 249 indexed citations . Written by Nancy MacLean covering the research area of History and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (120 citations), Political Science and International Relations (115 citations), Economics and Econometrics (49 citations), Education (34 citations) and Finance (24 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w76972818.