Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984
Impact in
- Authors
- Nancy C. Andreasen
- Journal
- Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w75867930 →Countries where authors are citing Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984
This map shows the geographic impact of Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984
This network shows the impact of Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984.
About Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) 1984
This paper, published in 1995, received 2.1k indexed citations . Written by Nancy C. Andreasen. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (620 citations), Clinical Psychology (291 citations), Philosophy (260 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (224 citations). Published in Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w75867930.