Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service
Impact in
- Authors
- Michael Lipsky
- Journal
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74008472 →Countries where authors are citing Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service
This map shows the geographic impact of Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service
This network shows the impact of Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service.
About Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service
This paper, published in 1980, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Michael Lipsky. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (625 citations), Political Science and International Relations (468 citations), Public Administration (378 citations), General Health Professions (303 citations) and Education (187 citations). Published in Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74008472.