Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?
Impact in
- Biochemistry 505
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72348972 →Countries where authors are citing Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?
This map shows the geographic impact of Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?
This network shows the impact of Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?.
About Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: where are we now?
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Barry Halliwell, John M.C. Gutteridge and C E Cross covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biochemistry (505 citations), Molecular Biology (464 citations), Plant Science (307 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (286 citations) and Organic Chemistry (221 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72348972.