Epidemiology: Principles and Methods
- Authors
- Brian MacMahonThomas F. Pugh
- Journal
- Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70516974 →Countries where authors are citing Epidemiology: Principles and Methods
This map shows the geographic impact of Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Epidemiology: Principles and Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Epidemiology: Principles and Methods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Epidemiology: Principles and Methods
This network shows the impact of Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Epidemiology: Principles and Methods.
About Epidemiology: Principles and Methods
This paper, published in 1970, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Brian MacMahon and Thomas F. Pugh. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (167 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (125 citations), Epidemiology (96 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (64 citations) and Health (64 citations). Published in Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70516974.