Natural resource and environmental economics
Impact in
- Journal
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68844641 →Countries where authors are citing Natural resource and environmental economics
This map shows the geographic impact of Natural resource and environmental economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natural resource and environmental economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural resource and environmental economics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Natural resource and environmental economics
This network shows the impact of Natural resource and environmental economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Natural resource and environmental economics.
About Natural resource and environmental economics
This paper, published in 1999, received 784 indexed citations . Written by Roger Perman, Yue Ma, Michael Common, David Maddison and James W. McGilvray. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (449 citations), Global and Planetary Change (179 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (170 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (125 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (81 citations). Published in Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68844641.