Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review
Impact in
- Gender Studies 481
Classified as
- Authors
- Robert Moffitt
- Journal
- Journal of Economic Literature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w678265 →Countries where authors are citing Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review
This network shows the impact of Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review.
About Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review
This paper, published in 1992, received 728 indexed citations . Written by Robert Moffitt covering the research area of Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Gender Studies (481 citations), Sociology and Political Science (338 citations), Economics and Econometrics (288 citations), General Health Professions (170 citations) and Demography (158 citations). Published in Journal of Economic Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w678265.