The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990.
Impact in
- Transplantation 259
- Surgery 175
Classified as
- Authors
- J. Michael Cecka
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w65645528 →Countries where authors are citing The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990.
This map shows the geographic impact of The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990.
This network shows the impact of The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990..
About The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--1990.
This paper, published in 1989, received 457 indexed citations . Written by J. Michael Cecka covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Transplantation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Transplantation (259 citations), Surgery (175 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (123 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (67 citations) and Nephrology (39 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w65645528.