Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges
This map shows the geographic impact of Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges
This network shows the impact of Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges.
About Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges
This paper, published in 2019, received 493 indexed citations . Written by Alex Borges Vieira, Luiz F. M. Vieira, Marcos A. M. Vieira and Omprakash Gnawali covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (451 citations), Global and Planetary Change (86 citations), Aerospace Engineering (38 citations), Biomedical Engineering (38 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (35 citations). Published in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2913348.