Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy

1.0k indexed citations
published 1998

Impact in

Authors
C. V. HowardMatthew Reed
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w62867326 →

Countries where authors are citing Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy.

About Unbiased Stereology: Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy

This paper, published in 1998, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by C. V. Howard and Matthew Reed. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (161 citations), Molecular Biology (161 citations), Applied Mathematics (126 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (106 citations) and Physiology (91 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w62867326.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-LearningBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Identification of the cis-Acting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Element Responsible for Transcriptional Induction of Mammalian Glucose-regulated ProteinsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approachBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper How Many Studies Do You Need?Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Production of hybridoma growth factor by human monocytesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structures?Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 Are Expressed Sequentially by Radial Glia, Intermediate Progenitor Cells, and Postmitotic Neurons in Developing NeocortexBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Thermal Fluctuations of a Single-Domain ParticleBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Global finite-time stabilization of a class of uncertain nonlinear systemsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Large voltage-induced magnetic anisotropy change in a few atomic layers of iron