The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.
Impact in
- Authors
- John A. Bargh
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w62008282 →Countries where authors are citing The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.
This map shows the geographic impact of The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.
This network shows the impact of The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition..
About The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.
This paper, published in 1994, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by John A. Bargh. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (563 citations), Social Psychology (538 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (342 citations), Applied Psychology (337 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w62008282.