Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance.

688 indexed citations
published 2007

Countries where authors are citing Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance..

About Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance.

This paper, published in 2007, received 688 indexed citations . Written by Derek Armitage, Fikret Berkes and Nancy C. Doubleday. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (390 citations), Sociology and Political Science (173 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (157 citations), Ecology (151 citations) and General Health Professions (73 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5800906.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact