MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century
Impact in
- Plant Science 492
- Cell Biology 477
Classified as
- Journal
- Studies in Mycology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5452009 →Countries where authors are citing MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century
This map shows the geographic impact of MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century more than expected).
Fields of papers citing MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century
This network shows the impact of MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century.
About MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century
This paper, published in 2004, received 604 indexed citations . Written by P.W. Crous, W. Gams, Joost A. Stalpers, Vincent Robert and Gerrit Stegehuis covering the research area of Ecological Modeling, Plant Science and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (492 citations), Cell Biology (477 citations), Molecular Biology (245 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (115 citations) and Pharmacology (66 citations). Published in Studies in Mycology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5452009.